FSSAI proposes red hexagon warnings on packaged food
FSSAI has proposed a red hexagonal front-of-pack warning system for high sugar, saturated fat and salt, rolled out in two phases. The nutrient thresholds are not specified in the proposal as reported, and no implementation date has been given.
- FSSAI has proposed a red hexagonal front-of-pack warning system for packaged foods high in added sugar, added saturated fat or salt.
- Phase 1 catches products exceeding limits for at least two specified nutrients plus specified highly sweetened beverages, and Phase 2 catches any product exceeding the limit for a single nutrient.
- The nutrient limits are to be set using the Dietary Guidelines for Indians, 2024 from ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, and no gram or percentage thresholds are specified in the proposal as reported.
- This is a proposal with no implementation date given, so brands should triage SKUs by Phase 1 and Phase 2 exposure while reformulation and pack redesign lead times still allow it.
FSSAI has proposed “a red hexagonal front-of-pack warning system for packaged foods containing high levels of added sugar, added saturated fat or salt.” A compliance affidavit was submitted on Friday, after the Supreme Court directed the authorities to formulate appropriate regulations.
The rollout is proposed in two phases, and the gap between them is where the operator work sits. Phase 1 covers products that exceed the limits for at least two specified nutrients, plus specified highly sweetened beverages. Phase 2 widens it to products that exceed the prescribed limit for any single nutrient. A SKU that clears Phase 1 because it breaches only one limit is not safe. It is simply caught later.
The warnings would state “High Fat”, “High Sugar” or “High Salt”. Specified sweetened beverages would carry a “Highly Sweetened Beverage” declaration. The type size is specified as “one point larger than the font used in the nutrition information table”, so this is not a footnote on the back of pack.
The thresholds are the missing piece. Nutrient limits are to be determined using the Dietary Guidelines for Indians, 2024, from ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, but no gram or percentage figures are specified in the proposal as reported. Until those numbers are published, no brand can say with certainty which side of a line a formulation sits on.
The exclusions are short and literal: single-ingredient foods inherently high in fat, sugar or salt, specifically “ghee, edible oil, salt, sugar, jaggery and honey.”
The Supreme Court had questioned whether “such numerical information would be readily understood by ordinary consumers” and raised concerns about industry pressure, with the Bench emphasising “the particular vulnerability of children to packaged food products.”
This is a proposal, not a rule in force, and no implementation date has been given. It follows the separate FSSAI move on claim words that we covered on 27 August.
For a brand operator, a red hexagon is a merchandising event rather than a labelling tweak. It changes what the pack communicates on a shelf and, more sharply, in a thumbnail on a quick commerce app. Start the triage now. Sort the portfolio into SKUs that would trip Phase 1 on two nutrients and SKUs that would only trip Phase 2 on one, because reformulation and pack redesign both run on long lead times and you cannot start either after the thresholds land.
Zane’s analysis draws on original reporting by Storyboard18. Read the original report.