Gift card GST in India: when the tax lands
A brand selling gift cards into the October festive window has to decide which date the GST attaches to: the day the card is sold, or the day it is spent. Since 1 October 2025 that question has one answer, and it is not the answer most vendor guides still print.
- No GST is payable when a gift card is sold. The tax attaches at redemption, on the goods actually supplied, at the rate those goods carry on that date.
- Circular No. 243/37/2024-GST dated 31 December 2024 holds that a transaction in vouchers is neither a supply of goods nor a supply of services, and sections 12(4) and 13(4) of the CGST Act were omitted with effect from 1 October 2025.
- Trading your cards principal to principal attracts no GST on the margin, but an agent's distribution commission and any co-branding or tech support fee are taxable services.
- Section 17(5)(h) speaks of goods, so it does not reach the instrument itself. The circular says nothing about input tax credit, so treat that question as open rather than settled.
If a brand sells a Rs 2,000 gift card on 8 October and the customer spends it on 20 November, the date the tax attaches to is what decides the return. Until late 2025 that question had three live answers in India, depending on which authority you read. It now has one.
The answer, stated plainly
GST is not payable when the gift card is sold. It is payable when the card is redeemed, on the goods actually supplied against it, at the rate those goods carry on the date of redemption. The sale of the card is not a supply at all.
That is the position in CBIC Circular No. 243/37/2024-GST dated 31 December 2024, issued after the 55th GST Council meeting of 21 December 2024. Its operative finding is that a transaction in vouchers cannot be a supply of goods or a supply of services, because a voucher is only an instrument that creates an obligation on the seller to accept it as consideration. Section 2(118) of the CGST Act, 2017 defines a voucher in exactly those terms.
Two routes to the same destination
The circular reaches that answer twice, and which route your card takes depends on whether it is a prepaid payment instrument recognised by the Reserve Bank of India.
- If the voucher is an RBI-recognised prepaid payment instrument, it falls inside money as defined in section 2(75), which covers any other instrument recognised by the RBI when used as consideration to settle an obligation. Money is carved out of goods under section 2(52) and out of services under section 2(102). No supply, no GST.
- If it is not, the circular treats it as an actionable claim. Entry 6 of Schedule III puts actionable claims, other than specified actionable claims, outside the scope of supply altogether. Again no GST.
A single-brand card redeemable only against your own catalogue sits outside the RBI prepaid framework, so in practice it travels the second route. Both routes end in the same place, which is why the classification argument matters less than the commentary on it suggests.
What was removed, and what it replaced
This is not a restatement of old law, which is why anything written before late 2025 is unsafe here. Sections 12(4) and 13(4) of the CGST Act used to fix a time of supply for vouchers, and rule 32(6) of the CGST Rules valued them. The 55th Council recommended deleting all three. The Finance Act, 2025 omitted the two sub-sections, and Notification No. 16/2025-Central Tax dated 17 September 2025 brought that omission into force from 1 October 2025.
Before that, the rulings genuinely conflicted. The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling and its appellate authority held in Premier Sales Promotion that vouchers were goods. The Karnataka High Court set that aside on 16 January 2023, holding vouchers to be money. The Madras High Court, on 27 November 2023 in Kalyan Jewellers, instead called a gift voucher an actionable claim, taxable at redemption under the then section 12(4)(b) unless the card named identified goods at a specified value. An advance ruling binds only the applicant who sought it, so none of that gave a third brand cover. There is no Supreme Court judgment on voucher GST: Sodexo SVC India in December 2015 concerned octroi under a Maharashtra municipal statute.
Your card versus a card you merely distribute
The circular separates two commercial models, and the distinction is worth settling before signing a distribution agreement.
- Principal to principal. A distributor buys your cards at a discount and resells on its own account. The circular says this pure trading in vouchers is not a supply of goods or services, so the trading margin carries no GST.
- Principal to agent. The distributor never owns the card and earns a commission or fee for placing it. That commission is a taxable supply of services.
Separately, whatever the platform actually does for you is taxable on its own terms. The circular names advertisement, co-branding, marketing and promotion, customisation, technology support and customer support as services chargeable at the applicable rate when contracted for. If you are looking at gift card distribution on quick commerce, the fee schedule usually mixes all three buckets, and only part of it falls outside GST.
Input tax credit on a card you hand out free
Section 17(5)(h) blocks input tax credit on goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples, and Circular No. 92/11/2019-GST dated 7 March 2019 is the CBIC reading of it for promotional schemes. The textual point is that clause (h) speaks of goods. A voucher is money or an actionable claim, not goods, so issuing a free promotional card is not a disposal of goods by way of gift and clause (h) does not reach the instrument.
What clause (h) could still reach is stock leaving the shelf when a wholly free card is redeemed with no cash top-up, because no consideration ever flowed. Circular 243 is silent on input tax credit, so treat this as a position to document rather than a settled rule.
The paperwork, and the two cases that break it
No supply at sale means no tax invoice at sale, and no receipt voucher under section 31(3)(d) either, because that document exists for an advance received towards a supply. A commercial receipt is the right document, and no e-invoice is generated, since e-invoicing attaches to an invoice for a supply. At redemption you raise an ordinary tax invoice for the goods handed over, and whatever e-invoicing obligation already applies to your turnover applies to it.
Two situations trip up finance teams. On a part redemption, you invoice only the goods taken and the unspent balance stays a liability until it is used or lapses. On a rate mismatch, the rate is simply the rate of the goods supplied on the date of supply, because nothing was assumed at sale, so a card sold before the two slab restructuring of 22 September 2025 and redeemed after it needs no adjustment on the card itself. The usual rules on GST credit notes and e-invoicing govern anything that comes back later.
One boundary to keep clear, because the two get filed together and should not be. A gift card is not a loyalty point. Points are a deferred discount you fund yourself, which is why loyalty points liability and breakage economics behaves like a marketing cost. A gift card is cash the customer has already paid you, so it carries payment regulation and tax timing instead.